|
Post by Elkish on Apr 18, 2016 16:00:48 GMT
OFFICIAL CHARGES: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Federation of Phyrabia vs. The Illuminati Council
CHARGES: Counting the vote of a Convicted Felon - The Brotherhood of Phuckers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Trial will take place on April 18th, 12:00 PM EDT.
P.S. He dropped charges against all other nations.
If you are present, please say so. We will start the trial shortly.
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:02:06 GMT
Hello. I am here. Once all witnesses, and Phryabia are present, we can begin
|
|
1 posts
|
Post by migaza on Apr 18, 2016 16:03:32 GMT
I'm here
|
|
1 posts
|
Post by whirlpoolio on Apr 18, 2016 16:04:28 GMT
I am checking in, where is Phyrabia?
|
|
35 posts
|
Post by Phyrabia on Apr 18, 2016 16:05:22 GMT
Sorry now Im here
|
|
|
Post by Elkish on Apr 18, 2016 16:06:08 GMT
Okay we will now start with Opening Arguments. You may start, Unidad y Prosperidad.
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:06:10 GMT
Ok. Chief Justice, my witnesses are here.
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:06:32 GMT
I will begin my opening argument
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:06:53 GMT
Your honor, the people of the court, I am new at this. This is my first case and it is very important to the future of this region. I would just like to try and make this short by saying that the accused nation had not showed any signs of being a criminal when his vote was counted. In fact, he ceased to exist after the impeachment vote was over, not during which would be a different case. He was not of any harm to the region while he was here and in a real life case, a felon’s vote would still count if he voted BEFORE being convicted. The region has no knowledge that the nation in question would break any rules. The region’s policy, which I believe you wrote, former Chancellor, states that ALL nations can exercise their write to vote. This section of the Constitution is extremely vague and does not offer any specifics on citizenship and what is ethical or unethical. This nation, despite later breaking a game rule, was not harming anyone or displaying any plan to cause any harm, except to support a fellow region. This region is not responsible for the nations actions, but it would be unethical for us, as a region, to grant this to the former Chancellor, making it the one vote he needs to become Chancellor again.
|
|
35 posts
|
Post by Phyrabia on Apr 18, 2016 16:09:21 GMT
First off I would like to say BoP means Brotherhood of Phuckers
|
|
35 posts
|
Post by Phyrabia on Apr 18, 2016 16:09:56 GMT
The Constitution of the Illuminati Council, the very document that this region was founded on. To violate it is to insult every Nation in this region, and the BoP did just that, they came to our region and spat on our constitution then left. Now I must ask you, where is the BoP now, and the answer is nowhere, because their account was deleted. The Illuminati Council allowed for someone who was a convicted criminal to vote in a elections and have a deciding factor in our politics. Not only did BoP have no intention of being a productive member of the Illuminati council he was also found guilty of crimes against the WA. I commend the WA for their initiative to rout out the unwanted in every region. The BoP were just that, they had no right to be in our region, not only because they had no intention of being a member state, but because they were also a Satellite state, who are illegal under Article IV Section III of our great constitution. To come to our Region and violate our constitution can not go unpunished and therefore, the vote of the BoP should not count within a strictly internal affair of the Illuminati Council.
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:12:38 GMT
May I ask which part of the constitution he violated?
|
|
14 posts
|
Post by unidadyprosperidad on Apr 18, 2016 16:13:05 GMT
He was not convicted or accused of being a puppet, so tell me which part he violated
|
|
|
Post by Elkish on Apr 18, 2016 16:13:12 GMT
We can move on to arguments or witnesses. So yes, you may now question each other.
|
|
35 posts
|
Post by Phyrabia on Apr 18, 2016 16:13:33 GMT
Article IV sections I and III
|
|